6,466 source records across 50 states and Washington, DC. Records include proposals, existing facilities, regulatory references, expansions and possible duplicates. Reported status and capacity are source claims, not certified current operation or measured demand.
Snapshot: 2026-10-28. Review the linked evidence before relying on a claim. Related records and expansions must not be counted as additional facilities.
Napa, CA · Prime Data Centers
Reported status: existing (mapped; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-06-14
Review note: Kaiser Napa OSM/IM3 classify one building, not independent datacenter operation
Kaiser Napa OSM/IM3 classify one building, not independent datacenter operation Evidence
Newark, CA · T5 Data Centers
Reported status: operational (expansion)
Reported capacity: 49.1 MW (scope and operation unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 30 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-06-15
Review note: T5 operator describes the Silicon Valley campus; CSV482 and CSV483 likely duplicate same Newark physical site, not two commissioned buildings
T5 operator describes the Silicon Valley campus; CSV482 and CSV483 likely duplicate same Newark physical site, not two commissioned buildings Evidence
Newark, CA · T5 Data Centers
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2025-09-26
Review note: PeeringDB facility11927 appears to name the T5 Newark campus already represented by CSV482, not a proved second site
PeeringDB facility11927 appears to name the T5 Newark campus already represented by CSV482, not a proved second site Evidence
North Fork, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: North Fork supplier locality conflicts with Los Angeles named site; ECHO regulated source is not building or commissioning proof
North Fork supplier locality conflicts with Los Angeles named site; ECHO regulated source is not building or commissioning proof Evidence
Oakland, CA · Behring Companies
Reported status: proposed
Reported capacity: 20 MW planned (scope and operation unverified)
Source reference: address match (exact): 415 20TH ST, OAKLAND, CA, 94612. Census Geocoder; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-09-21
Review note: Oakland former supercomputing building proposed reuse is not established as approved operational data-center facility
Oakland former supercomputing building proposed reuse is not established as approved operational data-center facility Evidence
Oakland, CA · Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-06-17
Review note: Digital Realty's OAK10 first-party facility address is 720 2nd St Oakland, same building as CSV487, not two campuses
Digital Realty's OAK10 first-party facility address is 720 2nd St Oakland, same building as CSV487, not two campuses Evidence
Oakland, CA · Digital Realty
Reported status: operational
Reported capacity: 2 MW operational (scope and operation unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-09-21
Review note: One first-party OAK10 at 720 2nd Street, not another campus; marketed building area is not current IT MW
One first-party OAK10 at 720 2nd Street, not another campus; marketed building area is not current IT MW Evidence
Oakley, CA · JB2 Partners / Oxfoot Oakley LLC
Reported status: cancelled
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-09-21
Review note: Oakley data-center *option* removed and industrial project approved; no operational data-center identity or pin is warranted
Oakley data-center *option* removed and industrial project approved; no operational data-center identity or pin is warranted Evidence
Ontario, CA · One Data Center America, LLC
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-09-12
Review note: Ontario supplier operational claim and EPA ECHO reference are insufficient independent first-party commissioning proof
Ontario supplier operational claim and EPA ECHO reference are insufficient independent first-party commissioning proof Evidence
Palmdale, CA
Reported status: existing (mapped; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10 (QLever osm-planet)
Review note: AT&T Palmdale OSM/IM3 one building reference has no current operator proof of dedicated datacenter
AT&T Palmdale OSM/IM3 one building reference has no current operator proof of dedicated datacenter Evidence
Palo Alto, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 150 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: EPA regulated facility identifier alone is not an operating AWS center or exact campus reference
EPA regulated facility identifier alone is not an operating AWS center or exact campus reference Evidence
Palo Alto, CA · Equinix
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-07-23
Review note: First-party Equinix SV8 at 529 Bryant St Palo Alto exactly links already published reviewed equinix-sv8-ca-20261029, not second site
First-party Equinix SV8 at 529 Bryant St Palo Alto exactly links already published reviewed equinix-sv8-ca-20261029, not second site Evidence
Current operator confirms SV8 operating colocation at the exact Bryant Street address. No campus expansion or office address is substituted. Evidence
Palo Alto, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: Palo Alto ECHO Google organization record is not a commissioned data-center identity
Palo Alto ECHO Google organization record is not a commissioned data-center identity Evidence
Pasadena, CA
Reported status: proposed
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-06-18
Review note: Pasadena source appears quantum-research proposal context, not independently verified hyperscale facility
Pasadena source appears quantum-research proposal context, not independently verified hyperscale facility Evidence
Petaluma, CA · X2nSat, Inc
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2025-09-26
Review note: PeeringDB fac5246 status ok does not independently prove actual current operating building
PeeringDB fac5246 status ok does not independently prove actual current operating building Evidence
Pittsburg, CA · AVAIO Digital Partners; Pittsburg Data Hub, LLC
Reported status: proposed
Reported capacity: 92 MW (scope and operation unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-07-17
Review note: Pittsburg official planning approval does not establish operations; supplier permitted vs under_construction labels conflict
Pittsburg official planning approval does not establish operations; supplier permitted vs under_construction labels conflict Evidence
Pleasanton, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 150 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: Two EPA registry references do not independently establish two commissioned sites
Two EPA registry references do not independently establish two commissioned sites Evidence
Pleasanton, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 30 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: EPA regulated entity record not independent operation proof
EPA regulated entity record not independent operation proof Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA · 365 Data Centers
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2025-09-26
Review note: Operator first-party confirms Rancho Cordova CA1 at 11085 Sun Center Drive; investigate canonical collision then field-level admission Exact immutable research ID and first-party operator facility are already accepted in production materializer as facility:reviewed:365-rancho-ca-20261029; no second site, phase, power or map point.
Operator first-party confirms Rancho Cordova CA1 at 11085 Sun Center Drive; investigate canonical collision then field-level admission Evidence
Reviewed 2026-10-29 existing facility admission `facility:reviewed:365-rancho-ca-20261029` uses this identical research ID and operator primary URL; field-level source review does not create a new facility or authorize additional map geography. Evidence
Current operator verifies Rancho Cordova colocation at 11085 Sun Center Drive. Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 150 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: EPA regulated organization alone does not establish a separate data center
EPA regulated organization alone does not establish a separate data center Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA · EdgeConneX
Reported status: operational
Reported capacity: 2.00 MW (scope and operation unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-07-23
Review note: EdgeConneX SAC01 and EDCSAC01 likely same Rancho Cordova site, do not create duplicate campus or use ODbL pin
EdgeConneX SAC01 and EDCSAC01 likely same Rancho Cordova site, do not create duplicate campus or use ODbL pin Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA · EdgeConneX Inc.
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2025-09-26
Review note: EDCSAC01 PeeringDB facility likely one Sacramento physical campus with SAC01; PDB ok alone not second operating facility
EDCSAC01 PeeringDB facility likely one Sacramento physical campus with SAC01; PDB ok alone not second operating facility Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 30 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: EPA listing is not independent verified operating datacenter
EPA listing is not independent verified operating datacenter Evidence
Rancho Cordova, CA · Sungard Availability Services
Reported status: operational
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-06-17
Review note: Sungard AS Sacramento in Rancho Cordova remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Sungard AS Sacramento in Rancho Cordova remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Redlands, CA
Reported status: existing (mapped; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10 (QLever osm-planet)
Review note: Unnamed source-mapped object in Redlands remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Unnamed source-mapped object in Redlands remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Redwood City, CA · AT&T
Reported status: operational
Reported capacity: 4 MW operational (scope and operation unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-09-12
Review note: AT&T Redwood City Data Center in Redwood City remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
AT&T Redwood City Data Center in Redwood City remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Redwood City, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 30 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: Stanford Itss Data Center in Redwood City remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Stanford Itss Data Center in Redwood City remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Riverbank, CA · Spartan Data Centers (with Aemetis, Inc.)
Reported status: proposed
Reported capacity: 60 MW planned (scope and operation unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10-19
Review note: Riverbank Industrial Complex Data Center in Riverbank remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Riverbank Industrial Complex Data Center in Riverbank remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Rocklin, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Regulatory reference: FRS facility point (stated accuracy 30 m). EPA FRS/ECHO; not a verified facility pin.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: Gap - Data Center in Rocklin remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Gap - Data Center in Rocklin remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence
Rocklin, CA
Reported status: existing (EPA facility record; status unverified)
Exact location not published.
Original source · 2026-10-28
Review note: Gap Data Center, Inc. - Menlo Dr. in Rocklin remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence.
Gap Data Center, Inc. - Menlo Dr. in Rocklin remains a research lead; published source status, EPA facility index, or vendor geometry is not independently verified operating facility evidence. Evidence